< Hannon_St_Pauls_Statement_Dec_2008

 

  

Future use of St Paul’s Property: No Consensus Exists

 

     Garden City residents expressed their opinion on this topic during December 

in several polls and surveys sponsored by the property owners associations.  

Both the polls and the participants were an impressive display of democracy at

 work. The results, as reported by the Garden City News, can be

obtained by clicking here:

http://www.gcnews.com/news/2008/1205/Front_page/001.html 

     St. Pauls is owned by the Village of Garden City. Generally state law  

allows the land to be used for any municipal purpose. Uses beyond such purposes 

require legislation. An additional aspect of the St Pauls property is its designation 

as parkland; that was done by virtue of two separate processes involving

this land.  

      Change in use from parkland also requires legislation, invoking a decades-long 

 set of New York State protocols and policy considerations:

 (http://www.nysparks.state.ny.us/news/public/archive/2005_AlienationHandbook.pdf) 

     As State Senator, the fifteen years of debate about the use of the property, the 

multiple proposals offered and the public discussion often led to discussions 

about the possibility of State legislation.  The various nature of the proposals, 

the various “generations” of the discussions and the deeply held positions by 

different groups of Village residents, gave rise to my formulating the  

standard that State legislation should only be entertained if there was 

a consensus of the residents in favor of the specific proposal.

     In light of the vote and in light of the other surveys and polls, I judge the

the possibilty of State legislation as not  having a attained a  consensus of the

 residents. The GC News results show the demolition  option gained

  45.4% of the vote, the mothballing option gained 37.1% of the vote

 and the Avalon  Bay option gained 17.4% of the vote.

     Obviously my comments only address  one part of the situation.

At this point it is essential the community  works with one another in

considering the next steps.